Solutions
Customer Support
Resources
This article explores the legal framework for electronic signatures in Finland. It covers relevant EU regulations, national laws, the different types of electronic signatures, and how Finland’s approach compares to other countries.
Finland follows both the EU’s and its own laws for electronic signatures. As part of the EU, Finland uses the eIDAS Regulation (EU No. 910/2014), which is basically the rulebook for how electronic signatures work across all EU countries. This regulation ensures that eSignatures are legal and are treated in the same manner throughout Europe.
To put these EU rules into practice at home, Finland created its own law called the Act on Strong Electronic Identification and Electronic Trust Services (617/2009). This law, which was updated in 2016 to align with eIDAS, covers how electronic signatures work, regulates trust service providers, and sets security standards for digital authentication.
In addition to eIDAS and the The Act on Strong Electronic Identification and Electronic Trust Services (617/2009, several other regulations also play a role when it comes to electronic signatures:
Yes, electronic signatures are completely legal in Finland. In fact, Finnish contract law does not usually require any specific format for agreements, which means electronic signatures work just fine for most everyday situations.
Since Finland follows the EU's eIDAS rules (which have been in place since July 2016), electronic signatures have solid legal backing. Finnish courts accept electronically signed documents as evidence, and eSignatures count as valid proof that you agreed to something.
The best part is that you can use electronic signatures for most types of agreements and transactions in Finland. There are just a few exceptions, like wills, marriage papers, and some property deals, which still need traditional signatures or special handling. We'll cover that shortly.
Before you jump into using eSignatures in Finland, there are a few important things to keep in mind.
First, make sure your electronic signature follows the EU's eIDAS rules. If you want the strongest legal protection, a qualified electronic signature (QES) is your best bet – it's treated just like a traditional pen-and-paper signature.
The signer also needs to clearly show that they actually mean to sign the contract. This means they’re giving your consent and understand what they’re signing up for.
What’s more, you need to ensure that the eSignature cannot be changed after you sign it. Any tampering should be easy to spot, and you should work with an eSignature provider that makes it impossible to change signed documents. This provider should also ensure that e-signatures can be specifically traced back to the signer. Their identity should be verifiable, and the signature should be uniquely theirs.
If you're using a qualified electronic signature (which are essentially considered to be equivalent to wet-ink signatures), you'll need to use an approved signature creation device and have a qualified certificate. These give you extra security and the highest level of legal recognition in Finland and across the EU.
You can use electronic signatures for most agreements and transactions in Finland. Finnish law is pretty flexible about how contracts are formed – they call it the "freedom of form principle." This basically means you can make agreements in whatever format works, unless a specific law says otherwise.
In everyday terms, this means eSignatures work just fine for most things you need to sign. You only need to worry about using traditional pen-and-paper signatures when the law specifically requires it or when a document needs to be notarized.
However, some exceptions exist where electronic signatures are not allowed or where additional requirements apply. Here are some examples:
Electronic signatures in Finland fall into three categories, as defined by the eIDAS Regulation. Each type offers a different level of security and legal certainty. While all electronic signatures are legally valid, the strength of evidence they provide varies.
Choosing the right type of electronic signature depends on the importance and risk of the document. While SES may be fine for everyday agreements, AdES or QES should be used for legally significant transactions that require strong identity verification and security.
Finland's eSignature rules are almost exactly the same as other EU and EEA countries since they all follow the same EU rulebook (eIDAS). This means if you get a qualified electronic signature (QES) in any EU country, it automatically works in Finland too – making it incredibly easy to sign documents across borders.
Norway is not in the EU, but their rules are almost identical under their 2018 law. Both Finland and Norway do not allow eSignatures for specific situations like wills, marriage papers, and some property deals. The main difference? Norway specifically requires the high-security QES for certain big-money transactions, while Finland is more flexible depending on what's at stake.
The UK is different since Brexit. They do not automatically follow EU rules anymore, so they look at each eSignature case by case. While a QES is automatically valid in Finland, UK courts will check if you really meant to sign and how secure the signature was.
Outside Europe, countries take different approaches. The US is more relaxed – their laws (ESIGN and UETA) allow most eSignatures without requiring the extra security levels like AdES or QES. South Africa, meanwhile, is more like Finland, only giving QES the same legal weight as pen-and-paper signatures.
Finland's eSignature rules will likely evolve over the next few years, though not drastically. The biggest change will be "eIDAS 2.0," which is basically an update to how the EU handles digital identity.
This will introduce a European Digital Identity Wallet where you can keep government-issued digital IDs on your phone to sign contracts and prove who you are anywhere in the EU. This should make it easier for everyone in Finland to use the most secure type of eSignatures (QES).
Another interesting possibility is online notarization. Right now, for documents like wills, marriage papers, and some property deals, you still have to sign papers in person. But as other countries start using secure video calls for signing and witnessing documents, Finland might follow suit.
Finland's government services are also getting more digital. They might expand how eSignatures work with the Suomi.fi e-Identification system, making it easier to use eSignatures for official business. As fewer people want to deal with paper, Finland will likely encourage more widespread eSignature use, so long as they remain secure.
Yes. Under eIDAS and Finnish contract law, electronic signatures are legally valid for most agreements unless a specific law requires a handwritten signature.
Yes. Courts recognize electronically signed documents as valid evidence, but the level of proof required depends on the type of signature used. Qualified Electronic Signatures (QES) are automatically valid.
No. Some documents, such as wills, prenuptial agreements, and certain real estate transactions, require handwritten signatures or notarization.
No. Simple (SES) or Advanced (AdES) electronic signatures are valid in many cases, but a QES offers the highest legal certainty and is preferred for high-value contracts.
Yes. Under eIDAS, a QES from any EU or EEA country is legally valid in Finland and vice versa, ensuring smooth international transactions.
Many businesses and individuals use BankID, Mobile ID, or eSignature platforms like Visma Sign, DocuSign, or Juro to verify identity and sign documents securely.
Finland is preparing for eIDAS 2.0, which will introduce European Digital Identity Wallets, making secure electronic signing more accessible across the EU.
Creating legally binding eSignatures in Finland does not have to be complicated. You have several options, from simply scanning your handwritten signature to using more sophisticated methods.
Since Finland puts emphasis on security, especially for important documents, the most reliable way to create eSignatures is to use dedicated eSigning tools or a complete contract management platform that includes native eSigning features.
Here's why many Finnish businesses, including Wolt, are choosing platforms like Juro for their eSignature needs:
By using a dedicated platform for your eSignatures, you can close deals faster and manage your contracts more efficiently while staying compliant with Finnish eSignature requirements.
Ready to discover how Juro can help you create legally binding eSignatures? Check it out below.
Juro is not a law firm and this article should not be relied on as legal advice.
Juro embeds contracting in the tools business teams use every day, so they can agree and manage contracts end-to-end - while legal stays in control.
Juro embeds contracting in the tools business teams use every day, so they can agree and manage contracts end-to-end - while legal stays in control.
Book your demo