Solutions
Customer Support
Resources
The Canadian law on eSignatures can vary slightly between provinces, but one thing remains certain: electronic signatures on the rise.
Whether you're leading the way with electronic signing, or just getting started, this guide is well worth a read.
Electronic signatures are legally binding and valid in Canada so long as there is the clear intention by the parties to be legally bound by the agreement when signing. This means they hold the same weight as wet ink signatures.
The stance on electronic signatures in Canada is made clear by the vast library of federal acts and regulations that confirm the validity of eSignatures.
“Most Canadian provincial and territorial jurisdictions have enacted electronic commerce and transaction laws that provide electronic equivalents to paper-based signatures” - Treasury Board of Canada Secreatariat
At the federal level, the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) provides a broad framework for recognizing electronic signatures as valid and enforceable, particularly in commerce and business dealings.
However, several provinces have also adopted their own legislation that governs electronic signatures with some slight regional differences. Let’s break down the various eSignature laws and regulations in Canada, and how they vary.
The Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) establishes the use of electronic signatures for federal matters.
PIPEDA recognizes the legal validity of electronic signatures in most business transactions, provided certain requirements are met:
Under PIPEDA, an electronic signature is defined as: “a signature that consists of one or more letters, characters, numbers or other symbols in digital form incorporated in, attached to or associated with an electronic document”.
The Uniform Electronic Commerce Act (UECA) is a model law developed by the Uniform Law Conference of Canada to provide a standardized framework for the use of electronic communications and transactions, including electronic signatures, across Canadian provinces and territories.
While the UECA recognizes the validity of electronic signatures, it emphasizes that the reliability of the method used to create the signature is crucial. This means that electronic signatures should be created and stored in a way that ensures:
It is designed to harmonize electronic commerce laws throughout the country and facilitate the use of electronic signatures in business, government, and consumer transactions.
The UECA is not itself law but serves as a model for provinces and territories to adopt or adapt. Many Canadian jurisdictions have implemented legislation based on the UECA, with some variations in language or application. These are provincial laws, which we’ll explore now.
Canada’s provinces and territories have each adopted similar frameworks to PIPEDA but may have additional or unique requirements in certain areas. Some examples of the key provincial legislations include:
“A number of jurisdictions, including Canada’s provinces and territories, have developed laws, policies and standards for electronic documents and electronic signatures (e-signatures) since the mid-1990s” - Treasury Board of Canada Secreatariat
Quebec, however, has its own framework for electronic signatures, distinct from other provinces. The Act to Establish a Legal Framework for Information Technology governs the validity of electronic signatures and records within the province.
Quebec’s law places emphasis on "technological neutrality," meaning that it does not specify particular technologies but allows any reliable method of electronic signature, including digital certificates and encryption.
As in other provinces, electronic signatures are not valid for wills, personal trusts, or certain real estate transactions (e.g., those involving property transfers). Specific Quebec laws govern some exceptions where traditional signatures are still required.
To recap: eSignatures are widely accepted across Canada, and they're generally treated as equal to physical signatures, too. This means they're commonplace across commercial transactions in most provinces.
But how do you actually create an eSignature that fulfils the requirements of Canadian laws?
Well, the most popular option is to use an electronic signature solution like Docusign, or better, an end-to-end contracting solution like Juro that offers secure and convenient eSigning experiences.
Juro’s eSignature solution is designed to offer businesses a streamlined, integrated way to manage contract signing within a fully collaborative platform.
As part of its AI-native contract management system, Juro provides an end-to-end solution for drafting, negotiating, and executing contracts with built-in electronic signature functionality.
Juro's eSigning functionality is:
But the biggest benefit of using Juro is that eSigning is integrated with contract lifecycle management capabilities allowing businesses like yours to handle the entire contract lifecycle—from drafting and approval to signing and storage—within one centralized system.
To find out more, hit the button below for a personalized demo.
Book a demo to find out how Juro is helping 6000+ companies to agree and manage contracts up to 10x faster than traditional tools.
Canadian courts have generally upheld the validity of electronic signatures. These decisions have continued to affirm the validity and enforceability of electronic signatures.
For example, in Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership v. Canon Canada, the court held that the parties had reached a final agreement on all essential terms of a sponsorship agreement in an exchange of emails (the contract emails). The contract emails constituted an enforceable sponsorship agreement in this case, despite these being electronic.
A similar outcome arose in Leoppky v. Meston where the court ruled that the ‘in writing’ and signature requirements of the Statute of Frauds were met by the defendant’s email, and her typed name was sufficient to constitute an electronic signature.
These decisions and many others demonstrate the courts' willingness to interpret electronic signature laws broadly, adapting to modern business practices.
Other relevant cases include:
While electronic signatures are generally valid in Canada, there are some important exceptions where they are not accepted, particularly for documents that require additional formalities or have significant legal implications.
Examples of documents where electronic signatures may not be accepted include:
Yes, electronic signatures are generally legally binding in Canada, provided they meet the requirements set out in PIPEDA and relevant provincial laws.
While electronic signatures are widely accepted, certain documents like wills, negotiable instruments, and certain real estate documents typically require traditional signatures. Always check specific legal requirements for your particular situation.
An electronic signature must show the signatory's intent, be reliably linked to the document, and maintain the document's integrity to be legally binding.
Yes, industries like financial services, healthcare, and legal sectors have specific standards to ensure security and compliance.
Electronic signatures can be very secure, especially when using advanced solutions that offer encryption and authentication features. The level of security often depends on the method and technology used.
Yes, electronic signatures are admissible in Canadian courts. However, as with any evidence, their validity may be challenged and will be assessed based on the specific circumstances of each case.
In many cases, yes. Canadian federal and provincial governments allow the use of eSignatures for certain filings and forms, such as tax filings, business registrations, and some permits.
However, not all government documents may be eligible for electronic signatures.
No specific technology is required under Canadian law for a valid electronic signature, as long as the method used is reliable and captures the signer’s intent.
However, many businesses use specialized eSignature platforms (e.g., DocuSign or Adobe Sign) to ensure security and ease of use.
Yes, eSignatures can be used in cross-border transactions, provided they meet the requirements of the countries involved.
Canadian law generally recognizes electronic signatures for international transactions, but parties should ensure compliance with foreign laws.
Electronic signatures themselves do not expire, but the underlying contracts or documents they are attached to may have expiration terms.
In cases of digital signatures, the digital certificate used for authentication may have an expiration date, which requires renewal.
Leading providers include Juro, DocuSign, Adobe Sign, and HelloSign, among others.
Juro is not a law firm and this article should not be relied on as legal advice.
Modern businesses use Juro to automate contracts from drafting to signature and beyond, in an AI-enabled platform that every team can use. Want to see how?
Book a demo