Solutions
Customer Support
Resources
This guide answers key questions about the legality, requirements, standards, and practical applications of electronic signatures that govern their use in Brazil.
The primary law regulating electronic signatures in Brazil is the Provisional Measure No. 2,200-2/2001. This measure established the Brazilian Public Key Infrastructure (ICP-Brasil), providing a legal framework for the use of digital certificates to ensure the authenticity of electronic documents. This legislation set the foundation for the legal validity of electronic signatures in the country.
Provisional Measure No. 2,200-2/2001 states that electronic signatures are valid and legally binding if they are made using an ICP-Brasil digital certificate. This certificate confirms the identity of the signatory and the integrity of the document.
In 2020, Brazil took a significant step forward with the introduction of Law No. 14,063, which deals extensively with electronic signatures. This law further clarified and expanded the legal framework for electronic signatures, categorising them into three levels:
Each level offers different degrees of security and legal validity, catering to various needs and situations. You can find the Provisional Measure here, and Law 14,063/2020 here.
For an electronic signature or digital signature to be legally binding in Brazil, it must meet certain standards and conditions:
These standards and conditions ensure that electronic signatures in Brazil carry the same legal weight as traditional “wet ink” signatures when properly executed.
While electronic signatures are generally accepted in Brazil, there are some circumstances where they may not be considered valid:
Ready to explore digital workflows for your contracts? Hit the button below to find out more.
Book a demo to find out how Juro is helping 6000+ companies to agree and manage contracts up to 10x faster than traditional tools.
Find out more about eSignature laws in the Americas:
Brazilian courts have generally upheld the validity of electronic signatures in a number of cases. Recently, in the case of CAS Damazio Distribuidora de Gás Ltda. v. Companhia Ultragaz S/A, Appeal No. 0009004-04.2020.8.19.0213, (Apr. 2022), the Court of Appeals of the State of Rio de Janeiro held that the gas supply and equipment loan agreement between the parties had been validly signed electronically according to the standard set in Provisional Measure No. 2,200-2/2001, and that the authorship of the signatures and the integrity of the document’s content could be proved. You can read the judgement here.
Also, in FIDC Creditas Tempus v. Estevão Invenção de Souza Neto, Appeal No. 2012689-76.2022.8.26.0000, (Feb. 2022), the Court of Appeals of the State of São Paulo ruled in favour of the validity of electronically signed documents. Initially, the First Instance Judge required a manually signed agreement, citing Provisional Measure 2,200-2/2001. However, upon appeal, the court clarified that ICP-Brasil certification is not essential for an electronic document's validity and that Provisional Measure 2,200-2/2001 allows other means to prove the authorship and integrity of electronic signatures. This decision highlights the Brazilian courts' support for electronic signatures, recognizing their validity even without specific certification. You can access the judgement here.
Currently, there is no specific forthcoming legislation that aims to change the existing legal framework for electronic signatures in Brazil. The current legal framework, established by Provisional Measure No. 2,200-2 and Law No. 14,063, is considered robust and up-to-date. However, the Brazilian government continuously reviews and updates regulations to adapt to technological advancements and international best practices. Any future updates are likely to focus on enhancing security measures and expanding the use of electronic signatures in more areas of public administration.Stakeholders should stay informed about any potential legislative changes that might affect the use of eSignatures.
While the general legal framework for electronic signatures applies across industries, however, certain industries in Brazil have specific standards and requirements for electronic signatures:
These industry-specific standards ensure that electronic signatures meet the unique security and legal needs of each sector.
The use of electronic signatures in Brazil has seen significant growth in recent years across various sectors. Businesses and government agencies are increasingly recognizing the efficiency and security benefits of eSignatures. Key factors driving this growth include:
The Brazilian government has been a key player in promoting the adoption of eSignatures, implementing its use across various public services and encouraging private sector adoption.
Several providers offer electronic signature solutions in Brazil, helping businesses streamline their operations. Some of the leading providers include:
These providers offer a range of solutions catering to different needs, from simple electronic signatures to advanced digital certificate-based systems.
Yes, electronic signatures are legally binding in Brazil when they meet the required standards and conditions set by law.
The main laws are the Provisional Measure No. 2,200-2/2001, which established the Brazilian Public Key Infrastructure (ICP-Brasil) and Law No. 14,063/2020.
Brazil recognizes three types: simple, advanced, and qualified electronic signatures.
While electronic signatures are widely accepted, some high-value transactions or specific legal documents may still require traditional signatures.
The signature must use an ICP-Brasil digital certificate, ensure document integrity and authenticity, and have the consent and intent of the parties involved.
Not always. Simple electronic signatures don't require a digital certificate, but qualified signatures do.
Yes, recent decisions by the São Paulo State Court of Appeals, the Rio de Janeiro State Court of Appeals and the Superior Court of Justice have upheld the validity of electronic signatures meeting legal requirements.
There is no specific forthcoming legislation, but ongoing regulatory reviews may lead to updates.
Adoption is growing rapidly across various sectors. The government has been a key player in promoting the adoption of electronic Signatures, implementing its use across various public services and encouraging private sector adoption.
Leading providers include Juro, DocuSign, Adobe Sign, Signnow, RightSignature, HelloSign, and SignRequest.
Foreign electronic signatures can be recognized if they meet Brazilian legal standards or if there's a specific international agreement in place.
--
The legal framework for electronic signatures in Brazil is robust and continues to evolve with technological advancements. As businesses and government agencies increasingly adopt digital processes, the importance and prevalence of electronic signatures in Brazil are set to grow further. By understanding the legal requirements and choosing the appropriate level of electronic signature, individuals and organisations can confidently embrace this technology, enjoying its benefits of efficiency, security, and convenience.
Juro is not a law firm and this article should not be relied on as legal advice.
Modern businesses use Juro to automate contracts from drafting to signature and beyond, in an AI-enabled platform that every team can use. Want to see how?
Book a demo