USA: legal requirements and validity of electronic signatures in America

This article answers key questions about the legality, standards, and adoption of electronic signatures in the United States. Below we explore the legal framework governing electronic signatures in the United States of America, their requirements, and their application across different industries and contexts. Let's dive in.

Main laws determining the legality and binding status of electronic signatures in the United States

The legality and enforceability of electronic signatures in the United States are primarily governed by two key laws:

1. The Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act 2000 (ESign Act): The ESign Act, enacted in 2000, grants electronic signatures the same legal status as handwritten signatures in commerce. This federal law ensures that contracts signed electronically cannot be denied legal effect solely because they are in electronic form. It states that a signature, contract, or record cannot be denied legal effect solely because it is in electronic form. This law ensures that electronic signatures are valid across state lines and in international transactions.
2. The Uniform Electronic Transactions Act 1999 (UETA): UETA is a state-level law that complements the ESIGN Act. It has been adopted in 49 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the US Virgin Islands. The UETA has not been adopted by the State of New York, however, it has adopted similar laws making eSignatures legally enforceable. UETA provides a consistent legal framework for electronic transactions, ensuring electronic signatures and records are valid and enforceable. Although similar to the ESign Act, the UETA offers more detailed guidelines for electronic transactions.

These laws establish that electronic signatures are just as valid as traditional “wet ink” signatures for most transactions. You can find the full text of the ESign Act here, and the UETA here. 

Standards and conditions for a legally binding electronic signature in the United States

For an electronic signature to be legally binding in the United States, it must meet certain conditions under the ESign Act and UETA:

1. Intent to sign: The signatory must demonstrate a clear intention to sign the document electronically.
2. Consent to do business electronically: All parties involved must agree to conduct the transaction electronically.
3. Association of signature with the record: The electronic signature must be attached to or logically associated with the electronic document.
4. Record retention: The electronic record must be retained in a form that is accessible and can be accurately reproduced for later reference.

These conditions ensure the integrity and authenticity of electronic signatures, making them legally binding.

Interested in digital workflows for your contracts? Hit the button below to find out more.

Circumstances where an electronic signature may not be valid in the United States

While electronic signatures are generally accepted, there are specific circumstances where they may not be valid:

1. Wills and trusts: Many states do not allow electronic signatures for creating or amending wills and trusts.
2. Court orders, notices and official court documents: Certain court documents and legal notices require traditional handwritten signatures.
3. Family law-related documents: Documents related to marriage, divorce, adoption, and other family law matters often require handwritten signatures.

In these cases, traditional handwritten signatures or specific legal procedures may be required.

Recent court decisions on electronic signatures in the United States

The courts have generally upheld the validity of electronic signatures in the United States as long as they meet the legal requirements. Several recent court decisions have reaffirmed the validity of electronic signatures in this jurisdiction. For instance, in IO Moonwalkers, Inc. v. Banc of Am. Merch. Servs., LLC 814 S.E.2d 583, the court relied on the audit trail of the electronic document to prove that it had been electronically signed. Therefore, there was a valid contract between the parties, which was further ratified by their actions. You can read the full judgement here. 

In Barwick v. Government Employee Insurance Co., Inc., 2011 Ark. 128 (Ark. 2011), the court ruled that the plaintiff had waived her minimum medical coverage by signing the insurance policy electronically. It was held that ‘in writing’ requirement for a rejection of coverage for medical benefits had been satisfied, as the law explicitly makes provision for an electronic record. You can read the full judgement here.

Also, in Designs for Health, Inc. v. Miller 201 A.3d 1125,187 Conn.App. 1 (2019), the court held that the defendant had signed the agreement containing a forum selection clause electronically. You can read the full judgement here. 

These cases highlight the judiciary's support for electronic signatures, further solidifying the legal standing of eSignatures in the United States. However, the courts are very careful in deciding whether a document was indeed electronically signed when the evidence is not clear-cut. 

Forthcoming legislation on electronic signatures in the United States

Currently, there are no major federal legislative changes proposed regarding electronic signatures in the United States. However, as technology evolves, we may see updates to existing laws or new regulations to address emerging issues. Additionally, states may introduce specific amendments to UETA or related laws to address emerging technologies and trends. Keeping abreast of state-specific legislation is crucial for businesses relying on electronic signatures.

Industry-specific standards for electronic signatures in the United States

Certain industries have additional requirements for electronic signatures to ensure security and compliance:

1. Healthcare: The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) requires secure methods for electronic signatures to protect patient information. You can find the full text of the HIPAA here. 
2. Finance: The Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA) and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) mandate stringent security measures for electronic signatures in financial transactions. Additionally, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has guidelines for electronic signatures in financial transactions and record-keeping for member firms.You can access the EFTA here, and the GLBA here.
3. Real estate: Some states have additional requirements for electronic signatures in real estate transactions, such as notarization or witness signatures.
4. Government contracts: The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) provides specific guidelines for electronic signatures in government contracting. You can access the FAR here. 

Understanding these standards is vital for industry compliance and the legal enforceability of electronic signatures. It is important to always check industry-specific regulations when implementing electronic signatures in these sectors.

Adoption of electronic signatures in the United States

The adoption of electronic signatures has grown significantly across various sectors. Businesses and individuals increasingly recognize the convenience, efficiency, and security they offer. Key factors driving this adoption include:

• Enhanced security features in eSignature solutions: Modern eSignature platforms offer advanced security measures such as encryption, multi-factor authentication, and audit trails, which often provide greater protection against fraud and tampering than traditional paper-based signatures.
• Remote work trends:The rise of remote and distributed work environments has necessitated digital solutions for document signing, making eSignatures an essential tool for businesses with geographically dispersed teams.
• Increased efficiency and cost savings: Electronic signatures streamline document workflows, reducing processing time and eliminating costs associated with printing, mailing, and storing paper documents.
• Environmental Impact: Reducing paper usage contributes to sustainability efforts.
• Growing acceptance in legal and business contexts: As more courts and regulatory bodies recognize the validity of electronic signatures, businesses are increasingly confident in adopting these solutions for a wide range of transactions and agreements.

Leading providers of electronic signatures solutions in the United States

The US market for electronic signature solutions is competitive as several companies offer unique features and benefits. Some of the leading providers include: 

1. DocuSign: A global leader in electronic signature solutions.
2. Juro: A popular contract automation platform known for its user-friendly interface and comprehensive features, Juro is a top choice for businesses seeking reliable electronic signature solutions.
3. Adobe Sign: Part of the Adobe Document Cloud suite.
4. SignNow: Offers a user-friendly platform for electronic signatures. 
5. PandaDoc: Combines document creation with electronic signature capabilities.
6. HelloSign: A Dropbox company providing electronic signature solutions.
7. RightSignature: Part of Citrix, providing a secure and reliable eSignature solution.
8. SignRequest: Offers simple electronic signature solutions. 
9. Zoho Sign: Part of the Zoho suite, providing seamless integration with other Zoho applications.
10. Eversign: Offers a comprehensive eSignature platform with robust features.

These providers offer a range of features to meet various business needs, ensuring compliance with legal standards.

FAQ: common questions about electronic signatures in the United States

Are electronic signatures legally binding in the United States?

Yes, electronic signatures are legally binding in the US under the ESign Act and UETA.

What are the main laws governing electronic signatures in the United States?

The ESign Act and UETA are the primary laws that govern the legality and enforceability of electronic signatures in the United States.

What conditions must be met for an electronic signature to be legally binding?

An electronic signature must meet the following conditions: intent to sign, consent to do business electronically, association with the record, and record retention.

Can I use an electronic signature for all types of documents?

While electronic signatures are valid for most transactions and documents, there are exceptions such as wills and trusts, certain court orders and notices, family law documents and some other legal documents.

How secure are electronic signatures?

Electronic signatures can be very secure, often more so than traditional signatures, due to encryption and authentication measures.

How widely are electronic signatures adopted in the United States?

The adoption of electronic signatures is widespread, driven by factors such as remote work, cost savings, and environmental impact.

Can electronic signatures be used in international transactions?

Yes, the ESign Act covers foreign commerce, but be aware that other countries may have different laws regarding electronic signatures.

Are there any upcoming changes to electronic signature laws?

No significant federal legislative changes are currently proposed, but state-specific amendments may occur.

Are there industry-specific standards for electronic signatures?

Yes, industries like healthcare, finance, legal and real estate have additional requirements to ensure security and compliance.

Who are the leading providers of electronic signature solutions?

Leading providers include Juro, DocuSign, Adobe Sign, SignNow, and others, offering various features to meet business needs.

--

Electronic signatures are widely accepted and legally binding in the United States of America. As technology continues to advance, we can expect to see even greater adoption and refinement of eSignature laws and practices. By understanding the legal framework and requirements for electronic signatures, businesses and individuals can confidently embrace this efficient and secure method of signing documents.

Juro is not a law firm and this article should not be relied on as legal advice.