The 6 best Icertis alternatives for 2025

Icertis is one of the biggest names in enterprise contract lifecycle management (CLM).

But if you’re a growing business, or even a global enterprise rethinking your tech stack, you may be wondering: is Icertis the right fit for us — and if not, what are the alternatives?

In this guide, we’ll walk through the leading Icertis competitors, where they shine, where they fall short, and—most importantly—how to evaluate which one actually meets your needs.

What is Icertis?

Icertis is a contract intelligence platform typically adopted by large enterprises with global operations and high contract volumes. Its mission is to turn contracts from static documents into strategic, actionable insights.

Rather than serving simple or routine workflows, Icertis focuses on complex, regulated environments such as manufacturing, life sciences, and finance, where contracts carry serious operational risk. 

Over time, the company has added clause libraries, workflow automation, and advanced analytics to support these customers — with a price tag that reflects the platform’s depth.

Because of this positioning, smaller teams or simpler use cases may find Icertis too heavy or expensive compared to lighter, more agile alternatives.

Where Icertis stands in the CLM market today

Founded in 2009, Icertis was one of the first CLM vendors to go all-in on the cloud. By targeting large enterprises early, it became a trusted partner for Fortune 500 companies that needed to digitise complex supplier agreements and global contract estates.

That said, its reputation for complex deployments, high cost, and steep learning curves has opened the door for competitors that prioritise speed, usability, and affordability. In this guide, we explore those Icertis alternatives, and why you should consider them in your evaluation process. 

Methodology: how we selected Icertis alternatives

When compiling this list of Icertis alternatives, we conducted a three step research process:

• Analyst research: We reviewed leading industry reports, including Gartner’s Magic Quadrant for CLM (2024) and MGI Research’s CLM Top 35 Buyer’s Guide (2025). These publications highlight which vendors enterprises most often compare against Icertis when building a shortlist.
  
  
• Peer reviews: Analyst insights tell part of the story, but they don’t reflect what happens after rollout. To balance this, we analysed reviews from G2, Capterra, and Gartner Peer Insights. These gave us first-hand perspectives on usability, support, ROI, and adoption — the things buyers really care about once contracts are live.
  
  
• Market positioning: Finally, we looked at how each vendor defines its place in the market and which features they have to offer their customers. This helped us to identify key functionality gaps and understand where certain vendors excel or fall short.

By combining these three pillars, we’ve surfaced the vendors that most often appear as credible alternatives to Icertis in 2025 — whether you’re a scale-up, a mid-market business, or a global enterprise.

Best Icertis alternatives in 2025

1. DocuSign CLM

DocuSign CLM is DocuSign’s contract lifecycle management tool, extending its market-leading eSignature platform. Formerly known as SpringCM, it’s one of the oldest tools on the market and one of the most recognisable names.

Strengths compared to Icertis

• Seamless execution: Because DocuSign owns the eSignature space, its CLM integrates with DocuSign Sign out of the box. That means fewer integration headaches, less IT overhead, and a smoother experience for users who are already accustomed to DocuSign.
  
  
• Trusted security: DocuSign has built its brand on security and compliance. For risk-averse industries — finance, healthcare, government — this reputation reduces procurement friction and makes executive buy-in easier.
  
  
• Familiar setup: If your organisation already lives inside DocuSign, adding CLM feels more like turning on a new module than adopting a whole new system. This lowers the learning curve, helps with internal adoption, and avoids the change-management burden often seen with Icertis implementations.

Weaknesses compared to Icertis

• Analytics: DocuSign CLM’s dashboards and reporting are fine for basic oversight, but they don’t match Icertis’ AI-driven insights into risk, compliance, and obligation management. If your CFO or GC needs to know “what’s our exposure in supplier contracts this quarter?”, Icertis can deliver that; DocuSign usually can’t.
  
  
• Template management: While DocuSign CLM handles standard templates well, its clause libraries are less flexible than Icertis. This means that when legal wants to standardise contract language across hundreds of templates, or quickly adapt to a regulatory change, it may take more effort in DocuSign than in Icertis.
  
  
• Breadth of functionality: DocuSign CLM is strongest at managing workflows around signature, but it doesn’t go nearly as deep into post-signature obligations, vendor performance, or global compliance — all areas where Icertis has invested heavily.

What do real users say?

DocuSign CLM scores 4.3/5 on G2, slightly higher than Icertis. Reviews are mixed: some call it “highly organised and customisable”, while others describe it as “cumbersome and exhausting”, noting it can even increase contract cycle times. Independent reviewers also say it’s slower to ROI than Icertis and often more expensive.

Is it right for your requirements?

DocuSign CLM is a good Icertis alternative if you already live in DocuSign and want to extend that investment. It’s strongest if security and signing integration matter more to you than deep analytics or obligations management.

2. Juro

Juro is a browser-native CLM designed for fast adoption across sales, HR, and ops teams as well as legal.

Juro is one of the best Icertis alternatives because, unlike legacy CLMs, Juro is flexible, AI-native, embedded in the tools you already use and can be set up in days, not months. This is a major advantage over older, heavyweight Icertis alternatives. 

Strengths compared to Icertis

• Fast rollout: Users deploy Juro in weeks instead of months. For scale-ups, this is the difference between fixing contract chaos this quarter vs next year. Getting to value quickly is proven to increase adoption of a CLM, so this makes Juro a fantastic Icertis alternative for those wanting a tool that’s easy to implement and adopt.
  
  
• Collaboration-first: Juro's intuitive, user-friendly editor makes negotiation seamless, allowing users to add external and internal facing comments directly in the platform, with all versioning captured securely in a detailed audit trail. This drives adoption beyond legal, while Icertis’ heavier workflows can limit use to specialists.
  
  
• All-in-one: Juro empowers legal and business teams to draft, negotiate, sign, and store in one workspace. Icertis often requires multiple tools for editing, signing, and storage. For example, Icertis users integrate a third-party eSigning tool like Adobe Sign or Docusign with the platform. Juro has native eSignature functionality instead.
  
  
• Business-friendly integrations: Juro connects directly with Salesforce, HubSpot, and Slack, embedding contracts in daily workflows. Icertis prioritises ERP and procurement integrations, making it better suited to individuals in those sectors.
  

Weaknesses compared to Icertis

• Not as customizable: Juro doesn’t offer the complex functionality Icertis delivers. Although, having every feature you can possibly think of isn’t necessarily a good thing with a CLM. This leads to over-complexity, disillusionment by non-power users, and low levels of adoption. Juro is designed to be clean, powerful, and intuitive without being overly complex.
  
  
• Analytics: Juro offers AI contract review functionality, but it doesn’t offer risk-scoring and other predictive analytics just yet. If you need these features, Icertis is a better fit.
  
  
• Compliance depth: Icertis’ compliance modules are more robust for regulated enterprises. Juro focuses on usability, not regulatory breadth.

What do real users say?

Juro scores 4.8/5 on G2, making it one of the top-rated alternatives to Icertis amongst real users, and significantly more favoured than other Icertis itself.

One Juro user explained the key difference between Juro and Icertis well: “Overall we think Juro offers a great balance between control and self-service and is the perfect tool for fast-growing teams, in particular SaaS businesses, where Sales and Legal work closely together.”

Is it right for your requirements?

Juro is the best Icertis alternative overall if you’re a growing company that values adoption and speed over enterprise-grade complexity.

With Juro, sales, HR, legal, and operations can all draft, negotiate, sign, and store contracts in a single browser-based workspace. No more Word files emailed back and forth, no more chasing signatures across multiple tools, and no more confusion over where contracts live.

That’s why Juro is consistently one of the highest-rated CLMs on G2, with users praising its speed to value, ease of adoption, and Google Docs-style editor that anyone can pick up in minutes.

If your priority is adoption, collaboration, and speed to ROI — not heavy, enterprise-grade complexity — then Juro is worth a closer look. Book a demo to see how Juro compares to Icertis in practice.

3. CobbleStone

CobbleStone is one of the older players in the CLM market, founded in the 1990s. It positions itself as a cost-conscious CLM for mid-enterprise organisations, offering a broad feature set at a lower price point than Icertis.

Strengths compared to Icertis

• Pricing: CobbleStone is more affordable than Icertis, making it attractive to mid-sized enterprises that need functionality but can’t justify Icertis’ price tag. This lowers the barrier to entry for organisations that might otherwise remain stuck with manual processes.
  
  
• Configurability: CobbleStone offers flexible workflows and reporting options. While not as advanced as Icertis, it allows mid-market businesses to customise processes without heavy reliance on external consultants.
  
  
• Experience: Having been in the market for decades, CobbleStone has built credibility in contract management. For buyers nervous about newer vendors, this longevity can feel reassuring compared to younger CLM startups.

Weaknesses compared to Icertis

• AI maturity: While CobbleStone has added AI features, they’re not as advanced as Icertis’ contract intelligence. This means fewer predictive insights, and more manual effort in identifying risks or obligations.

• Less suitable for commercial teams: While CobbleStone offers a well-rounded experience for procurement professionals, it isn't as suitable for commercial teams who often deal with sales agreements from a different angle.
  
  
• Enterprise readiness: CobbleStone isn’t as proven in highly regulated, global deployments. For multinational corporations with complex obligations, Icertis’ track record is more reliable.

What do real users say?

CobbleStone scores 4.8/5 on G2. Users appreciate its simplicity and clear navigation, which sets it apart from Icertis. However, some reviewers mention the interface feels dated and that customer support can be inconsistent, which impacts user satisfaction.

Is it right for your requirements?

CobbleStone is a good Icertis alternative if you’re a mid-enterprise company that wants core CLM features without enterprise-level costs. But if you need cutting-edge AI or proven global governance, Icertis could be a better choice.

4. SpotDraft

SpotDraft is a CLM with AI-assisted review and playbook enforcement built into it. It focuses on shrinking legal’s manual review time while keeping tight control over language and risk — especially for high-volume standard contracts like NDAs, vendor agreements, and sales order forms.

Strengths compared to Icertis

• Offers AI redlining: SpotDraft suggests edits, flags deviations, and applies playbooks automatically, similar to Juro’s AI contract review software. If your lawyers are buried in routine reviews, those automated workflows enable users to reclaim hours weekly.
  
  
• Automated guardrails: SpotDraft offers contract playbook enforcement, which allows business users to self-serve within safe boundaries. With Icertis’ broad configurability, you can achieve similar outcomes, but it typically involves more configuration and admin effort.
  
  
• Less maintenance admin: Because the scope is narrower than an enterprise-wide governance platform, teams can maintain it with a lean legal ops function, whereas Icertis programmes often assume SI/vendor involvement for ongoing evolution.

Weaknesses compared to Icertis

• No native eSign: SpotDraft doesn’t offer a native eSigning solution, unlike Icertis alternatives like Juro. This reliance on DocuSign or Adobe adds extra cost to contracting and introduces more context-switching.
  
  
• Template agility: Updating templates sometimes requires vendor support. In dynamic environments where terms change frequently, this slows responsiveness. By contrast, Icertis’ clause library allows faster in-house adjustments at scale.
  
  
• Scale limitations: SpotDraft is better suited for mid-market and departmental use cases, but less proven in global, multi-entity enterprises. Icertis has the maturity and track record needed at that level, but Spotdraft may not.

What do real users say?

SpotDraft scores 4.5/5 on G2. Users highlight time savings on NDAs and praise its AI review features. Some, however, mention that template updates are 'tedious' and accessing support is 'cumbersome'.

Is it right for your requirements?

SpotDraft is a good Icertis alternative if you want AI-assisted contract review and efficient playbook enforcement. However, if you need native eSignature functionality, a flexible template editor, or post-signature obligations tracking, other Icertis alternatives might be a better fit.

5. Sirion

Sirion is a contract intelligence platform best known for its post-signature contract management capabilities. It helps enterprises monitor obligations, SLAs, and supplier performance at scale.

Strengths compared to Icertis

• Obligations management: Sirion excels at tracking detailed deliverables and service levels. For businesses where missed SLAs can result in financial loss, this granularity helps prevent value leakage. Icertis also supports obligations, but Sirion often goes deeper.
  
  
• Supplier performance: Sirion’s analytics provide visibility into vendor behaviour, helping procurement teams identify underperformance early. This proactive approach allows companies to enforce accountability, rather than waiting for renewal periods.
  
  
• AI-based monitoring: Automated alerts flag compliance issues or risks in real time. This reduces the need for manual monitoring, which is resource-intensive and error-prone.
  

Weaknesses compared to Icertis

• Steep learning curve: Sirion’s depth can overwhelm casual users. Without training, adoption may falter outside of procurement and legal. Icertis, while also complex, has broader enterprise familiarity.
  
  
• Implementation timelines: Because of its obligations and performance focus, Sirion deployments can take months to configure fully. Icertis projects can be lengthy too, but are often supported by more structured partner ecosystems.
  
  
• Pre-signature experience: Drafting and negotiation in Sirion are functional but less intuitive compared to Icertis, which provides more balance across the contract lifecycle.
  
  
• Integration effort: Sirion integrates with ERP and procurement tools, but enterprises often find Icertis’ partnerships with SAP and Microsoft more mature.
  

What do real users say?

Sirion scores 4.5/5 on G2. Some users praise its ability to streamline contract management, but others note it’s complex to configure and onboarding can take time.

Is it right for your requirements?

Sirion is a good Icertis alternative if post-signature performance and supplier accountability are your biggest challenges. If you want strong pre- and post-signature balance, other Icertis alternatives, like Juro, offer a more end-to-end experience. 

6. Conga CLM

Conga CLM is part of the Conga revenue operations suite and is especially strong when tightly integrated with Salesforce. It’s a natural fit for organisations where contracting is an extension of the sales process.

Strengths compared to Icertis

• Deep Salesforce integration: Conga CLM integrates natively with Salesforce, embedding contracts directly into CRM workflows. For sales teams, this reduces re-keying errors and speeds up contract creation compared to Icertis, which requires more configuration for the same flow.
  
  
• Quote-to-cash alignment: Conga keeps contracts connected to pricing, quoting, and billing processes. This end-to-end revenue visibility is a major advantage for organisations where contracts directly impact revenue recognition.
  

Weaknesses compared to Icertis

• Dated interface: Conga’s UI is often described as clunky. For users outside sales operations, this can reduce adoption compared to Icertis, which has a more enterprise-polished interface.
  
  
• Configuration effort: Building workflows in Conga can be complex and time-consuming, requiring admin or IT support. Icertis’ workflows are also sophisticated, but G2 estimates that they take four months or more to implement.
  
  
• Post-signature coverage: Obligations tracking and compliance features are less developed than in Icertis, which makes Conga less suitable if risk continues after signature.

What do real users say?

Conga CLM scores 4.2/5 on G2. Users value the tight Salesforce integration but call the system resource-heavy to configure and maintain.

Is it right for your requirements?

Conga CLM is a strong Icertis alternative if your organisation is deeply invested in Salesforce and wants contracts embedded into quote-to-cash workflows. If you need an Icertis alternative that works beyond sales teams, a solution like Juro that works for legal and business teams will be a better fit. 

Choosing the right Icertis alternative

Icertis remains the heavyweight in enterprise CLM — especially for global organisations where obligations management, compliance, and advanced analytics are non-negotiable.

But as we’ve seen, not every business needs that level of depth, and many teams struggle with the trade-offs: longer implementations, higher costs, and steeper learning curves.

The good news is there’s now a diverse ecosystem of alternatives, each optimised for different needs:

• For adoption and speed: Tools like Juro are designed to be intuitive and collaborative, making them a better fit if your goal is to get sales, HR, and ops working directly in contracts without bottlenecks.
• For AI-assisted review and playbooks: SpotDraft excels at reducing legal’s workload on high-volume agreements.
• For post-signature performance: Sirion provides unrivalled visibility into obligations, SLAs, and vendor performance.
• For Salesforce-first teams: Conga integrates deeply with CRM and revenue operations, embedding contracts into the quote-to-cash flow.

If your business is growing fast, struggling with bottlenecks, or simply tired of contracts living in Word, email, and shared drives, Juro is built for you.

For teams that want a CLM platform people actually enjoy using — and a faster path to ROI — Juro is the best Icertis alternative on the market. To find out more, fill in the form below.