Juro vs Oneflow

Oneflow is a lightweight document processing tool used by commercial teams. But how does it fare for legal teams managing more complex contracts? Find out in this guide.
Get a demo
Juro enables scaling companies to scale their contracts

Feature comparison

Features

Juro

Adobe Sign

Browser-native rich text editor
Unlimited templates
Conversational forms
Approval workflows
Conditional logic
Internal commenting
Conditional approvers
External negotiation
Custom branding
Native, binding eSignature & audit trail
Kanban dashboard
Renewal reminders
Analytics
Dedicated customer success manager
Single sign-on
Bulk actions
Native Salesforce integration
Enterprise only
Native HubSpot integration
Native Zapier integration
Native Workday integration
Enterprise only
Native Greenhouse integration
Native Slack integration
Native Google Drive integration
Enterprise only
REST API & webhooks
Enterprise only

Features

Juro

Oneflow

Browser-native rich text editor
AI draft
AI summarize
AI review
Conversational forms
Approval workflows
Conditional logic
Internal commenting
External negotiation
Native, binding eSignature & audit trail
Kanban dashboard
Renewal reminders
Analytics
Dedicated customer success manager
Single sign-on
Bulk actions
Native Salesforce integration
Native HubSpot integration
Native Zapier integration
Native Workday integration
Native Greenhouse integration
Native Pipedrive integration
Native Slack integration
Native DocuSign integration
Native Google Drive integration
REST API & webhooks

Do you require a custom plan?

Get in touch

Oneflow is a lightweight document processing tool that enables teams to create, sign, and store contracts in one place. It’s praised for its simplicity and ease of use, particularly among teams that only want to create routine contracts. 

But does it offer the functionality legal teams need to manage contracts effectively in 2024? Or is Juro a better option? Let's find out.

How does Oneflow compare to Juro?

1. Not designed for legal teams

Notably, most of Oneflow’s case studies and independent reviews are focused on implementations within HR and sales teams, not legal teams. This suggests that the tool wasn’t designed for in-house lawyers, but for commercial teams instead. 

It’s also worth noting that the platform isn’t equipped with some of the features legal teams need to manage more complex contracts, including conditional logic and automated approval workflows. Without these, it’s difficult for legal teams to control contract terms and mitigate contract risk. 

This is distinct from Juro which was specifically designed to work for both legal and commercial teams, unlocking faster contract cycles and lowering business risk. 

Juro is very easy to use amongst lawyers and non-lawyers! Many different teams within our business benefit from Juro - Verified Juro user, G2 review

2. Inflexible contract editor

One common complaint about Oneflow is that the formatting and editing capabilities are limited. This means that teams have less freedom when creating and editing contract templates.

It would be great to have more functionality and flexibility when it comes to modifying templates - Verified Oneflow user, G2 review
It's hard to do custom/bespoke contracts. It's customizable, but pretty restricted - Verified Oneflow user, G2 review 

In some cases, these limitations make the contract creation process more time-consuming for teams, particularly if they have to mess around with simple formatting fixes or are forced to move the template into a separate tool for editing.

Juro's rich-text editor is more advanced, allowing legal and business teams to customize contract templates quickly and easily. Juro's formatting bar gives you complete control over how you want your document to look, without the hassle.

Juro have done a cracking job at making it really easy to create contracts and make edits to those contracts afterwards - Verified Juro user, G2 review
One of the standout features of Juro is its intuitive contract creation tool. Designing and customizing contracts has never been easier - Verified Juro user, G2 review

3. Lack of collaborative features

Another limitation of Oneflow compared to other CLM solutions is that it lacks some of the collaborative functionality teams need to negotiate contracts quickly and effectively. 

In particular, Oneflow doesn’t offer in-line commenting or approval workflows, meaning teams have to move contracts out of the platform and into Microsoft Word if they’re heavily negotiated. This creates friction during negotiations by forcing teams to jump back and forth between different tools and versions. 

This frustration is also reflected in independent reviews across G2 and Capterra. 

If the counterparty wants to modify the contract, they cannot suggest it from there and must do so externally - Verified Oneflow user, G2 review 
Some important features like in-line editing and audit trails for terms are missing - Verified Oneflow user, Capterra review

This is distinct from Juro which enables users to toggle between internal and external versions, create comment threads, and add redlines - all without leaving the platform.

Juro users can also scroll back through the timeline of changes with an audit trail that captures contract activity at every stage. This makes it quick and easy to see when revisions are made and track negotiations, which isn't possible in Oneflow.

Juro’s in-browser negotiation means I can be on a call with the prospect, editing a document in real time, and they can sign it two minutes later - Cleo Anderson Garwood, Senior Legal Counsel, Paddle

4. Limited search functionality

Independent reviews also suggest that contracts are difficult to find and query in Oneflow. Users can tag and store contracts in Oneflow, but it doesn't offer OCR search functionality, meaning contracts aren't searchable beyond the titles and tags added manually. This results in the following complaints:

It is rather complicated to find and search for contracts today - Verified Oneflow user, G2 review

By contrast, Juro's OCR technology makes it quick and easy for teams to query contracts, without the need for extensive tagging. This reduces the time your team spends searching for contracts and enables you to focus on higher-value work.

Oneflow pricing

Oneflow offer a variety of pricing plans, including Essentials, Business and Enterprise options. However, most of the core features are locked behind a business plan, making it the most popular choice for businesses that want to unlock basic contract management functionality.

Oneflow plans also use user-based pricing, which means that the tool can quickly become expensive if you onboard a lot of casual users. This is something growing teams should consider before choosing the tool.

Oneflow reviews

Oneflow has a rating of 4.5 out of 5 on G2, which is considerably lower than Juro's G2 score of 4.8 out of 5.

Oneflow is also rated lower than Juro across all three criteria on G2, including ease of use, quality of support, and ease of setup. This suggests that users prefer Juro to Oneflow.

Why businesses choose Juro

Contracts are high-stakes. They govern every hire, sale, and transaction your business makes, so you need a reliable CLM vendor that meets your requirements.

Juro has category-leading setup and support scores across trusted review sites, along with the features you need to scale. Juro's AI-enabled contract automation platform meets stringent security requirements, with SOC2 Type II compliance and a legal AI assistant built with privacy in mind.

It also offers the features you need to create, agree, execute and manage contracts up to 10x faster than traditional tools, allowing your business to scale without growing pains.

To find out more about why businesses choose Juro over Oneflow, hit the button below to book a personalized demo.

Want to save 90% of time on contracts?

Book a demo to find out how Juro is helping 6000+ companies to agree and manage contracts up to 10x faster than traditional tools.

Get a demo

6000+ companies power contracts with Juro

4.8/5 on G2
4.8/5 on G2

Juro allows us to manage our own templates in Juro without need for tech help; it allows our colleagues to self-serve; its integrations keep everything where we need it; and mass creation saves us loads of time

Victoria S

Chief Legal Officer

It's hyper connectable to a number of systems we use, reducing the need to do pointless Admin. Juro also take customer feedback very seriously, releasing product functionality requested by me (the ability to use PDFs as contract templates).

Luke H

EU People Operations

The simplicity to create, edit, and send contracts. The ability to have template contracts makes it very easy to re-use standard contracts and populate those before sending.

Callum H

Senior Revenue Operations Analyst

Juro allows us to manage our own templates in Juro without need for tech help; it allows our colleagues to self-serve; its integrations keep everything where we need it; and mass creation saves us loads of time

Victoria S

Chief Legal Officer

It's hyper connectable to a number of systems we use, reducing the need to do pointless Admin. Juro also take customer feedback very seriously, releasing product functionality requested by me (the ability to use PDFs as contract templates).

Luke H

EU People Operations

The simplicity to create, edit, and send contracts. The ability to have template contracts makes it very easy to re-use standard contracts and populate those before sending.

Callum H

Senior Revenue Operations Analyst

Frequently Asked Questions

Our team is on hand to answer your questions. Hit the button in the bottom right corner to chat with us.

Is Juro's native eSignature legally binding?

Yes, Juro's native electronic signature is legally binding and globally recognised in most jurisdictions.

Which countries does Juro operate in?

Juro powers more than 300,000 contracts for more than 6,000 companies in more than 85 countries, across Europe, the US, Latin America and Asia.

Who are Juro's investors?

Juro is backed by: Eight Roads (who also back Cazoo, Alibaba and Made.com); Union Square Ventures (who also back Twitter, Twilio and Coinbase); Point Nine Capital (who also back Zendesk, Revolut and Typeform); and the founders of Indeed.com, Gumtree and Wise.

Can I import contracts into Juro?

Yes. Juro offers drag-and-drop import thanks to its AI-powered Contract Reader. This means you can quickly and easily import contracts into Juro.

How can I get started with Juro?

Switching to Juro is simple. Just fill in the form below to book a personalised demo at a time that suits you.

Instantly book a personalized demo

  • Schedule a live, interactive demo with a Juro specialist

  • See in-depth analysis of your contract process - and tailored solutions

  • Find out what all-in-one contract automation can do for your business

4.8
4.8

Schedule a demo

To learn more about the use of your personal data, please consult our readable Privacy Policy.

Your privacy at a glance

Hello. We are Juro Online Limited (known by humans as Juro). Here's a summary of how we protect your data and respect your privacy.

Read the full policy
(no legalese, we promise)
Contracts

Juro vs Oneflow

Oneflow is a lightweight document processing tool used by commercial teams. But how does it fare for legal teams managing more complex contracts? Find out in this guide.