Solutions
Customer Support
Resources

What's the difference between a bilateral contract and a unilateral contract, and which do you need? Let's explore in this quick explainer.

In a unilateral contract only one party agrees to do something. And in a bilateral contract, both (or all) parties agree to do something. That's the short answer.
That’s it. We can all go home.
Only kidding, sorry. It’s actually a bit more complicated than that. Let’s have a closer look at both. So first of all - what is a unilateral contract?
One of the biggest differences between a bilateral contract and a unilateral contract is the number of people or parties promising to do something. Bilateral contracts involve at least two people who are obligated to do something, while unilateral contracts only have one. This means that only one party is legally bound within a unilateral contract.
That’s why most business contracts are bilateral contracts, as they usually involve a transaction of some sort between parties, each with their own concrete obligations.
In bilateral contracts parties can make an exchange upfront, while in unilateral contracts, the party offering the deal only promises to pay (or whatever) when a certain action is complete.
Consider the example of an advert for a reward in exchange for finding a lost dog. It’s unlikely that the dog owner will pay this reward to an individual before the dog has been found, particularly since there’s no guarantee that they will find it.
Unilateral contracts are very much the exception in the world of business contracts because they don’t guarantee something will be completed – e.g. if you offer a reward for your missing dog there’s no guarantee someone will bring them back.
Contracts are key to the recognition of revenue in modern businesses, which almost always constitutes consideration for an action being completed in a bilateral contract.

It completely depends on the situation, and who you want to enter into a contract with. Legally speaking both unilateral and bilateral contracts have the same standing – they can both be broken, or ‘breached’, and they’re both enforceable in court. So if something goes wrong with either type you’ll have to prove that:
If contract processes are proving painful for your business, use the form below to get in touch to find out more about all-in-one contract automation.
Juro embeds contracting in the tools business teams use every day, so they can agree and manage contracts end-to-end - while legal stays in control.

.avif)
The Juro knowledge team is an interdisciplinary group of Juro's brightest minds. Our knowledge team incorporates different perspectives from a range of knowledgeable stakeholders at Juro, including our legal engineers, customers success specialists, legal team, executive team and founders. This breadth and depth of knowledge means we can deliver high-quality, well-researched, and informed content, leaning on our internal subject matter experts and their unique experience in the process.
Juro's knowledge team is led by Tom Bangay, Sofia Tyson, and Katherine Bryant, but regularly features other contributors from across the business.

Juro embeds contracting in the tools business teams use every day, so they can agree and manage contracts end-to-end - while legal stays in control.
Book your demo