Conga is a popular document automation solution for sales teams. Juro is a contract platform built for the whole business. Which is right for you?
Conga is built for sales teams running commercial contracts through Salesforce. Juro works for every team, every contract type, and goes it live in weeks, not quarters.
Conga is built around the sales motion, making it a natural fit for commercial agreements that originate in the CRM. But everything else gets forced into a process that was never designed for it.
Juro works for every contract a business runs. Legal, HR, finance, and ops teams all use the same platform, the same templating, and the same workflow. Juro is a tool for the whole business, not just the deals that close in sales.
Conga generates documents from Salesforce data, but templates require hand-coding and contracts still end up in Word — leaving teams with a fragmented, manual path to signature.
Juro's editor was purpose-built for contracts. It's intuitive enough for any stakeholder, and powerful enough to take a contract from first draft to signed without ever leaving the browser.
Conga's learning curve is steep for administrators and end users alike, with reviews reporting that many tasks require technical support or development resources to configure and maintain.
Juro is designed so that business teams can own their contracts without involving IT. Self-serve intake forms, built-in legal guardrails, intuitive dashboards, and a clean editor mean seamless adoption for businesses using Juro.
.svg)
“Implementing Juro has revolutionized the way that my team manages contracts! Tasks that used to take 1-2 hours are now completed in a fraction of that time!”
“Using Juro as our CLM tool has changed the game for our legal team. Implementation was excellent. Each of our contract stakeholders (including counsel) has increased visibility into contract terms and status”
“One of the amazing things about Juro is that the sales team can self-serve and take a lot of the initial burden off of the legal team”
“Conga CLM can be complex to configure and maintain, especially when setting up advanced workflows or custom integrations. The learning curve for administrators and end users is relatively steep, and some tasks require technical support or development effort”
“For bug fixes, the Conga team takes quite a lot of time, and we are not happy with this. Taking one or two months just to fix a small issue is not good, as it delays our entire business cycle. They really need to make significant improvements in this area”
"X-Author is a very hard product to work with. We face many issues, such as it sometimes stops working, crashes MS Word, or the extension itself gets disabled. Even after changing our system, we still experience these issues intermittently"
Conga CLM uses enterprise, quote-based pricing that varies based on the number of users, modules required, and implementation scope. Most deployments carry additional implementation costs on top of the licence fee — either through Conga's professional services or a third-party system integrator. That makes total cost of ownership difficult to predict upfront, and significantly higher than the headline price suggests.
No. Conga does not offer native eSignature. To get a contract signed, you need to push it to DocuSign or Adobe Sign — both of which require separate licences and add another vendor to manage.
Juro's legally binding eSignature is built into every plan at no extra cost. The entire process, from first draft to signed contract, stays in one place.
Conga CLM implementations are widely reported as lengthy and resource-intensive. Most deployments require a dedicated Salesforce admin or external consultant just to get templates and logic configured — before a single contract is processed. Enterprise rollouts regularly run to three to six months or more.
Juro is built for fast time-to-value. Most teams are processing live contracts within weeks, without needing a system integrator to get there.
Conga's AI centres on generating documents from CRM data and extracting information from existing contracts. It's useful within that scope, but narrow.
Juro's AI works across the full contract lifecycle — drafting, negotiation, review, and post-signature analysis.
Operator lets teams query their entire contract portfolio in natural language, surfacing insights across every agreement the business has ever signed. And unlike Conga's AI, it works entirely within Juro's browser-native editor, with no Word dependency or third-party plugin required.
Juro integrates with Salesforce, HubSpot, Docusign, Slack, Microsoft Word, Google Drive, Zapier, Greenhouse, Ashby, ChatGPT, and a REST API. Zapier extends that reach further - it connects Juro contracts with 6,000+ apps without writing a single line of code.
To compare more Conga alternatives, check out these pages:
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
.svg){kind=logo}
.svg){kind=logo}
.svg){kind=logo}
Hello. We are Juro Online Limited (known by humans as Juro). Here's a summary of how we protect your data and respect your privacy.
