Third-party contracts can be a real pain for legal and business teams.
But what if we told you that third-party contracts didn’t need to create a bottleneck?
After reading this article, you’ll feel equipped to quickly and confidently review and manage contracts on your counterparties’ paper. And the rest of the business will thank you for it.
What is a third-party contract?
Also known as a third-party paper, a third-party contract is a legal agreement that originates with the counterparty, and so follows their templates, structure and provisions instead of your own.
In other words, the agreement won’t be initiated by your legal team, but by theirs.
Some lawyers liken a third-party contract to playing a sport away at the other team’s ground. In many ways, they’re right.
When you initiate a contract yourself, you’re much more familiar with the provisions and arguments used. Meanwhile, third-party contracts take away this familiarity and advantage, leaving you playing on foreign turf.
When is a third-party agreement used?
Typically, the party that makes an offer to provide their goods or services will be the party that creates the contract, and the counterparty will review and eventually accept these terms. Think supplier or vendor agreements, for example.
This means that if you are the ‘other party’ and are receiving access to a product or service, you’ll be on the other end of a third-party contract, instead of initiating it yourself.
What are the disadvantages of using third-party contracts?
For those not familiar with the legal industry, the idea of the other party drafting up the contract can seem great because you won’t have to spend time writing a contract.
However, this couldn’t be further from the truth, and most legal teams would much prefer to own the contract, and its terms, themselves.
There are a few reasons for this:
1. Contract value leakage
One of the biggest concerns when managing a third party contract is that your business might gain less value from a transaction than they would have if the contract was initiated by yourselves instead.
In fact, PWC claims that poor management of third-party contracts can result in financial losses alongside reputational damage and unexpected liability.
The reasons behind this risk are obvious, as the counterparty will have proposed their own terms within the contract, and these will almost always favour the third party’s interests over yours.
Unfortunately, departing from these terms within negotiations can be a real challenge, particularly if the original terms are particularly harsh.
2. Lengthy contract review times
Third-party paper also takes a lot longer to review than contracts you create yourself, as your legal team will need to go through the agreement with a fine-toothed comb to find any unfavourable terms, craftily worded clauses and gaps in the provisions.
You might find numerous terms that need to be negotiated in a third party contract, and this can be a real pain point for legal teams that have a manual contract workflow and need to go back and forth over email to reach an agreement.
This time spent negotiating contracts can often lead to a long delay in getting contracts over the line, and it can consume large amounts of legal’s time that could be better spent on high-value work.
3. No visibility into contract data
There’s an increasing desire to digitize and extract data from contracts in scaling businesses, and this wealth of data is used to more effectively negotiate contracts, project revenue and speed up the contracting process.
When you initiate the contract yourself through a contract management software, for example, this data collection is often seamless, with contract metadata captured by default.
However, third-party contracts make this increasingly difficult to do, since they are often delivered in a completely different format to the contracts you’d usually query and audit, and the data within them remains static.
Fortunately, that won’t be the end state for most businesses today, because the next generation of contract lifecycle management software makes processing third-party contracts - and the data within them - seamless. Let’s explore this in more detail now.
How to regain control over third-party contracts
Juro doesn’t just support third-party contracts, it also empowers you to unlock the key data points within them and process them faster.
You can simply upload your third-party paper and let Juro’s AI Extract functionality do the heavy lifting. AI Extract will automatically tag all of your key datapoints, based on simple prompts you set up for these types of agreements.
But it doesn’t stop there. Juro's powerful AI can calculate dates and automatically set renewal reminders, as well as summarize contracts and flag risks.
With data extracted by AI, you're free to query your contract data however you want, enabling better decisions for your business, reduced review times, and increased visibility for vendor contracts.
“The feature allows us to expeditiously extract and review critical contract data and has considerably reduced our overall workflow timeline. I’ve been able to get twice as many contracts processed in the same amount of time” - Kyle Piper, Contracts Manager, ANC
With AI Extract, it's never been easier to unlock valuable insights from supplier and vendor agreements. You can:
- Push datapoints captured by AI Extract into integrated tools, like Salesforce, for example.
- Automate approvals, validations, and simple calculations with the metadata tagged by AI Extract.
- Review third-party contracts for risks and deviations using Juro's legal AI Assistant.
- Search, report on, and analyze the contract individually, or in combination with others.
- Store the fully signed document in Juro for future reference.
To see these workflows in action and discuss how Juro's AI Extract functionality can transform third-party contracting to your business, hit the button below for a personalized demo.