Solutions
Customer Support
Resources
.jpg)
How do you know if a GC fits the role you need, where do you find the top candidates, and what are the general counsel interview questions you should be asking? We answer all this (and more) detailed guide.
You often need to hire a GC when the legal work becomes too difficult (and expensive) to manage alongside other responsibilities or too complicated to handle without the right expertise.
Most often, this is in a growth stage where a businesses risk appetite is at its highest. In the earlier stages of a business, legal work sits with the person responsible for operations at the business.
As the business scales, so does the work these employees do and the risks the business has to take. At this stage it may become apparent that the business needs to hire a legal professional to handle incoming legal requests, alongside building legal infrastructure that will protect it against risk as it grows.
Other points that indicate the need for in-house resource include:
This depends on the kind of work your General Counsel will be doing.
If you’re looking for a lawyer to manage low-value contracts and oversee simple contract negotiations, but nothing else, then a GC will be overqualified for the role. It might be a different in-house legal job title you're hiring for.
Mishiring may result in disengagement with the work, and a higher chance they’ll end up leaving after a short period of time.
To ensure you’re hiring the most suitable person for the job, make sure you have answers to the following questions:
This can help you identify the right level of expertise for your business.
Hiring isn't always a binary "GC or no GC" decision.
Three models are common at scaling companies, and the right one depends on volume and complexity of legal work, not just company size:
If you're not sure which model fits, it's worth mapping out the actual legal workload first, ideally by volume and complexity rather than headcount, before deciding what kind of hire (or hires) will clear it.

The GC brief has broadened significantly since AI moved from experimentation into everyday operational use.
In most organizations today, the General Counsel is the executive who ends up owning AI governance: setting acceptable use policies, weighing in on liability exposure, and making sure the business can explain how its AI systems are actually controlled, not just how they're supposed to work on paper.
None of this requires a GC to be a technologist, but it does mean they need to be comfortable enough in the detail to challenge assumptions made by engineering and data teams, rather than rubber-stamping or merely rejecting them.
That shift shows up directly in job descriptions. Where GC postings once led with regulatory and compliance experience, most now also ask for:
1. Ownership of governance and accountability frameworks that hold up under scrutiny, not just policies that exist on paper.
2. Working fluency in technology, data and AI risk — enough to sit credibly in conversations about vendor selection, model governance and cross-border data flows, without needing to be the most technical person in the room.
3. Comfort using AI tools day-to-day, since legal teams are under real pressure to run more efficiently themselves. Industry research on legal tech adoption has found that close to half of corporate legal departments now use legal technology frequently or constantly, up sharply from the year before, with generative AI adoption driving most of that growth.
4. Strong executive and board-level communication, since hiring panels increasingly test judgment and risk framing through scenario-based discussions rather than pure legal-technical questions.
For hiring teams, the practical takeaway is to write (and interview against) a job description that reflects this broader remit, rather than a traditional compliance-and-litigation brief with "AI awareness" bolted on as an afterthought.
A candidate who's led AI governance or legal ops change elsewhere is often a stronger signal than years of experience alone.
{{quote1}}
You have three main options when choosing how to approach hiring a general counsel.
You can turn to law firms that you've worked with in the past for candidates. If you're at a startup that until that point, has been using a law firm, you could ask them for recommendations based on similar clients of theirs.
This could be an effective way to source top talent with relevant experience. You can also post the job on LinkedIn, though the success of this approach will depend on the size and reach of your network.
Reaching out to a community specifically for GCs and senior lawyers can be useful. One example is Juro’s community of 1,600+ in-house lawyers.
Having access to closed-door events, exclusive content, perks and a curated General Counsel jobs board in this area may help you narrow your search:
{{role}}
The downside to this is that there aren’t that many specialist recruiters to choose from, especially when you’re looking at specific roles, so your options may be limited. But this can be an effective way to outsource the heavy lifting of sourcing talent.
Hiring a general counsel is not cheap, and the number varies a lot by company stage, not just country.
According to Salary.com, the base salary for a General Counsel in the US is an average of $365,000, but that figure blends a wide range.
Early-stage startup GCs often earn closer to $200,000-$350,000 in base pay, topped up with equity that can become significant if the company succeeds, while GCs at large public companies can see total compensation stretch well into seven figures once bonus and equity are included.
In the UK, the average salary for a General Counsel is £158,615, according to Glassdoor's salary benchmarks, with London GCs commanding a premium at closer to £190,000, and salaries generally running higher for candidates who've handled M&A, funding rounds or multi-jurisdiction regulatory work.
For a full rundown of the average general counsel pay across several countries, and by company stage, check out this page.
If a full-time hire at these levels isn't justified yet, it's worth weighing that cost against a fractional GC or senior legal counsel hire instead.
It’s important to assess both hard and soft skills in the interview process, particularly given the breadth of tasks that cross a General Counsel's desk.
An effective way to do this is through written tasks. For example, you could set your GC the task of redlining part of your Master Services Agreement (MSA) and assess based on their approach to the task; are they highlighting every minor detail? Or are they prioritising important points over nitpicking? Do they have strong attention to detail? Or are they haphazard in their redlining process?
When hiring the first GC at Juro, Richard Mabey set this task. He says: “We wanted to see if that candidate could prioritise the most significant points - are they redlining contracts strategically, or are they striking everything out?”
{{quote2}}
Being able to identify a candidate's strengths and weaknesses in a contract markup can be an effective indicator of how they work, and if they’d work well in your business. You can ask your current external counsel to help with the process of assessing quality of work and interviewing.
Values interviews can be really useful when assessing soft skills. These are usually conversations between the candidate and other colleagues in the business, outside of the team the candidate will be joining. A General Counsel, for example, would speak with colleagues outside of legal.
These interviews allow employers to assess how well the candidate works with others, which is super important – there’s no point being the most talented lawyer in the business if you’re difficult to work with!
Another effective way to measure soft skills is to set a presentation task, like working through a 90 day plan template, or creating a skeleton legal playbook. This will help the business assess the candidate’s clarity, communication skills and interpersonal skills.

There are several factors that determine whether a General Counsel is the right fit for your business, such as growth mindset, experience, collaborative nature and value-add.
Establishing a 90-day plan with quantifiable outcomes can help set the General Counsel up for success and provide accountability.
Being able to attribute metrics to the role and work in a data-driven way is also a good sign of a successful General Counsel; what are the contract turnaround times for commercial teams, for example? How many legal issues or queries were resolved in a month? What is the internal NPS of the legal team?
This removes the subjectivity and allows colleagues to objectively measure success of the legal function, which is really important.
In fact, the earlier you can define and relay success to prospective GCs, the better. We often see these key objectives show up in job descriptions for General Counsel hires, for example:
Hiring a General Counsel to build and scale the legal function is an exciting stage of a company’s life. By understanding what you need from a legal leader, what they can offer, and how to measure success, you can ensure the GC hits the ground running from day one, and delivers value to the wider business. We hope this guide helps!





