The 5 best PandaDoc alternatives in 2023

July 13, 2022

PandaDoc is a popular tool for automating sales proposals and getting them signed. 

But are there better alternatives to PandaDoc for teams looking to manage sales agreements? 

To help you find out, we’ve compared various vendor packages, features, and verified reviews to discover the five best PandaDoc alternatives in 2023. Keep reading to discover one that’s right for your business needs. 

What is PandaDoc?

PandaDoc is a cloud-based proposal management tool that helps sales teams to manage sales proposals and other collateral. Founded in 2013, PandaDoc’s proposal management software enables sales teams to generate, track, sign and share sales agreements.

Why consider an alternative to PandaDoc?

While PandaDoc is an effective software tool for sales proposals, there are a few limitations of the platform that are worth noting. According to independent reviews on G2, these limitations include: 

  • No advanced features for legal teams: One of the biggest drawbacks of PandaDoc is that it doesn’t offer the advanced functionality legal and sales teams need to manage contracts effectively. For example, the software doesn’t offer conditional logic or external contract negotiation. 
  • Criticisms about customer support: Reviews left by PandaDoc users describe the customer support to be unresponsive, overly technical, and difficult to access. This can make software adoption difficult. 
  • Challenges with formatting: Users often experience challenges with formatting proposals and business contracts. These problems include misaligned fields, difficulty resizing images, and auto-locking within templates. 

Fortunately, there are plenty of alternatives to PandaDoc for those seeking to automate contracts and sales proposals, each with its own benefits. Let’s explore them now. 

What are the best PandaDoc alternatives?

1. Juro 

Juro is the all-in-one contract automation platform that enables all teams to streamline the creation, execution, and management of routine contracts at scale. Juro enables users to process contracts end-to-end in one platform, which means no more switching between tools to get agreements over the line.

✅ Main benefits 

One of the biggest advantages of using Juro instead of PandaDoc is that Juro offers a richer feature set for legal teams. While PandaDoc does enable users to manage contracts, the software still lacks many of the core features legal teams need to do so effectively. 

Juro, by comparison, enables users to share documents externally and gain visibility into who views, edits, and shares contracts, with time-limited URLs, a timeline of changes, and split internal and external versions of a contract. These features make contract collaboration seamless. 

Juro is also an excellent alternative to PandaDoc due to its rich-text contract editor which enables business users to initiate simple contracts from templates pre-defined by legal users. 

It’s also easy to use, with an intuitive interface and flexible formatting options, making it simple for sales teams to self-serve on commercial agreements. This is distinct from PandaDoc’s contract editing functionality which is fairly rigid.

❌ Main limitations

However, Juro won’t be suitable for teams seeking to create sales proposals in particular, as Juro was designed specifically for managing contracts. This means that, while Juro is one of the best PandaDoc alternatives for contract management, it’s not a good fit for those seeking sales proposal software. 

💰 Pricing 

Juro has flexible pricing plans, meaning there’s something that’s right for every business. Juro offers separate plans for startups, growing teams, and fast-scaling companies. To find out more check out our pricing page

💬 Independent reviews

According to G2, Juro is rated 9.1 out of 10 for ease of use, 9.7 out of 10 for quality of support, and 9.1 out of 10 for ease of setup. This makes Juro one of the easiest document automation solutions to set up and use. Below are some reviews left by Juro users:

“The product is simple, easy to use, and largely intuitive. The team is a delight to work with - they take time to get to know you and your particular challenges which you need Juro to solve”
“Juro completely lifted the burden off our legal team by empowering our Sales team to handle the majority of small business contracts from start to finish”
“Juro is great at making contract negotiations go more smoothly. It's easy to get started and include multiple people in an individual contract negotiation (client, lawyer, colleagues, etc.)”
🏆 Best for:

Juro is the best PandaDoc alternative for businesses that want to streamline their contract management process and enable business teams to self-serve on contracts without legal losing control over them. 

However, Juro is not the best alternative to PandaDoc for businesses seeking to automate business proposals, as the platform is specifically designed to automate contracts instead. 

2. Proposify 

Like PandaDoc, Proposify is a platform that can be used to sign and manage sales proposals electronically. The cloud-based proposal software was established back in 2013 and seeks to help businesses create impressive sales documentation, including but not limited to sales proposals, quotes, and contracts. 

✅ Main benefits 

Proposify is one of the best PandaDoc alternatives in terms of the extensive feature set the software has to offer. Many independent reviews of the platform on Capterra suggest that the software has a comprehensive set of features, including but not limited to a content library, eSignature functionality, detailed analytics, and an editor for proposals. 

Another advantage of Proposify compared to certain other PandaDoc alternatives is how professional it can make proposals look. Various reviewers claim that Proposify’s software enables them to create professional, attractive, and consistent sales proposals that customers love. This is possible due to Proposify’s advanced design functionality, which many PandaDoc alternatives lack. 

❌ Main limitations

One of the biggest drawbacks of Proposify compared to other PandaDoc alternatives is that customizing templates can be challenging. Although Proposify does offer a custom template service whereby designers work with clients to create proposal templates, this complexity prevents sales teams from self-serving quickly and efficiently on sales agreements, which creates blockers throughout the sales cycle. 

This is a stark contrast to other PandaDoc alternatives like Juro which are top-rated for ease of use. Within Juro, users can create, customize and edit contract templates independently and on their own terms, regardless of their experience. 

According to independent reviews, another significant limitation of Proposify is its outdated and clunky user interface. Multiple verified users have reported that Proposify makes it difficult to format proposals and contracts, and that the software is often slow and buggy. This makes Proposify one of the less reliable alternatives to PandaDoc, despite its extensive functionality. 

It’s also worth noting that most of Proposify’s best features are designed for sales proposals, not legal documents like contracts. 

💰 Pricing 

Proposify offer two different plans: a team plan and a business plan. Proposify’s team plan is charged at $49 per user per month, offering unlimited documents, custom fields, and standard integrations. 

Meanwhile, Proposify’s business plan is priced from $590 per month, and the plan includes premium onboarding, a Salesforce integration, and other features like approval workflows. 

💬 Independent reviews

Proposify is rated 4.3 for ease of use, 4.5 for customer service, 4.4 for features, and 4.4 for 4.5 out of 5 overall on Capterra. Here are some independent reviews of Proposify taken from the review platform:

“Lots of features but they don’t work well. Slow. Very glitchy. Buggy"
“The software is very clunky and difficult to format. When adding information, the editor was constantly reformatting and it was not a good experience”
“It took me and my team a long time to figure out how to format certain additions and edits we had to the existing template. It was both our first time using the software, but our experience made us not utilize it again”
🏆 Best for:

Proposify is one of the best PandaDoc alternatives for teams seeking advanced design functionality when creating sales proposals. However, it’s less suitable for sales teams looking for a tool that’s easy to use and implement. 

3. is a revenue platform that also helps sales teams to create and sign sales proposals quickly and efficiently. This alternative to PandaDoc offers a content library, eSigning functionality, and document analytics like PandaDoc, but doesn’t offer the same level of flexibility when editing contracts as a tool like PandaDoc or Juro. 

That said, is a great alternative for sales teams that want to manage other sales operations, like configuring quotes and managing subscriptions. 

✅ Main benefits 

One of the biggest benefits of as a PandaDoc alternative is that it delivers functionality for sales teams beyond just proposal creation. Unlike PandaDoc which focuses on document creation, serves as a complete sales engagement platform, making it a great alternative to PandaDoc for teams that want one single sales solution. 

This also means that, similar to Juro, prevents business teams from switching back and forth between multiple different tools. Instead, this PandaDoc alternative centralizes all sales activity in one workspace. 

Another advantage of is that the platform offers contract management functionality, too. However, businesses will need to purchase’s CLM software separately from the company’s other offerings, meaning a full sales and contract management stack can quickly become expensive. 

❌ Main limitations

One significant limitation of is that it has a lengthy implementation period, making it unpopular among businesses that want to receive value quickly from their contract or proposal management tool. Long implementation periods make software challenging and expensive to adopt.

Reviews on G2 also describe the tool as confusing and challenging to self-serve with, particularly due to formatting limitations within the platform. This can make contract creation and the generation of proposals tedious and time-consuming - two problems that this type of software seeks to resolve. 

These are both important drawbacks of the tool, as software that’s unintuitive and overly complex risks not being adopted across the business. 

💰 Pricing 

Unfortunately, does not share its pricing information publicly. Instead, you’ll need to enquire with the sales team to receive a quote. 

💬 Independent reviews is rated 4.7 out of 5 overall on G2, with scores of 9.3 out of 10 for ease of use, 9.6 out of 10 for quality of support, and 8.6 out of 10 for ease of setup. This makes it one of the more difficult alternatives to PandaDoc to set up and use. Below are some independent reviews of the platform, taken from G2:

“It has a few limitations on the format design and we had to find a few workarounds for our implementation”
“Sometimes it's not as intuitive as I want it to be. There is a learning curve to building out your solution”
“DealHub does, at times, have some annoying formatting issues. Also, the tool is not always the most intuitive”
🏆 Best for: is a good PandaDoc alternative for sales teams seeking a comprehensive sales enablement tool. However, due to formatting limitations and its unintuitive interface, it’s likely not as good for creating, editing, and negotiating sales contracts as a platform like Juro. 

4. GetAccept 

GetAccept is yet another all-in-one sales enablement tool. This alternative to PandaDoc provides effective communication tools that facilitate more collaborative sales processes, and some of the essential features required to create, negotiate and manage sales contracts. 

✅ Main benefits 

One of the biggest benefits of GetAccept as an alternative to PandaDoc is that it acts as a comprehensive sales enablement tool, with deal analytics, automated quote generation, and more. 

Not only does the platform provide a way for users to author contracts and other sales documents, but it also provides pipeline insights and the features needed to create other content, like case studies, video demos, and company presentations. 

This makes GetAccept a great PandaDoc alternative for commercial teams that want to create and manage sales content more broadly.

Like Juro, GetAccept also offers automated contract reminders, native eSignature functionality, and the ability to set up approver and signatory sequences for contracts. These features are invaluable when managing contract workflows. 

❌ Main limitations

According to independent reviews on G2, one limitation of GetAccept is that the software’s text editor and template creation functionality isn’t as advanced as that of competitors. For instance, GetAccept users complain about the software’s lack of drag-and-drop functionality, as well as some glitches and bugs they encounter when creating contracts. 

Another common complaint among GetAccept users is that the search function used to find specific contracts is extremely limited. They note that the filtering system is ‘too basic’, so finding specific agreements and proposals amidst large volumes of contracts can be near impossible. 

This is a significant disadvantage of the platform compared to other PandaDoc alternatives that use advanced OCR functionality to manage contracts

💰 Pricing 

GetAccept’s basic plan which is best suited to small sales teams costs from $15 per user per month, making it one of the cheaper PandaDoc alternatives on the market. 

However, if teams don’t want to be capped on the number of send-outs they can use, they’ll likely need the professional plan, which is charged at $49 per user per month. 

Meanwhile, larger teams with more complex needs may benefit from GetAccept’s enterprise plan, which they can request a quote for. 

💬 Independent reviews

According to G2 reviews, GetAccept is rated 8.7 out of 10 for ease of use, 9 out of 10 for quality of support, and 8.4 out of 10 for ease of setup. Below are a few reviews of the software taken from G2:

“GetAccept is a bit behind some of the competition regarding actual document/template preparation and setup”
“With GetAccept I can now use one tool to deliver an amazing buying experience for my customer”
“The UI is a little bit busy, it could be cleaner and have fewer clicks for certain things”
🏆 Best for:

GetAccept is a great alternative to PandaDoc for businesses seeking a way to manage sales collateral. However, it’s less effective for managing contracts alone. If your focus is on improving the contract workflow for your business, a tool like Juro would be better placed.

5. Qwilr

Qwilr is another sales proposal tool and a close alternative for PandaDoc. However, unlike many PandaDoc alternatives, Qwilr transforms static sales proposals into interactive web pages, providing a more innovative experience for its users. 

✅ Main benefits 

One of the biggest advantages of using Qwilr is that it’s highly customizable, offering users plenty of options when customizing their sales proposals and emails. This enables sales teams to create content that looks professional and is more consistent with their company-wide branding.

Qwilr is also one of the more creative sales proposal platforms on the market, as it also enables users to embed interactive content within their documents. This means that sales teams can use the tool to embed videos, maps, calendar snippets, and other rich media into their proposals. 

 ❌ Main limitations

However, with customizability often comes complexity, and Qwilr is also among the more challenging PandaDoc alternatives to use. Some independent reviews of the tool describe it as clunky and say that it can be difficult to arrange and format the content blocks within proposals. This can make the software difficult to use. 

It’s also worth noting that Qwilr is better suited to creative sales documents than it is for more formal agreements, like contracts. This is because, unlike some other PandaDoc alternatives like Juro, Qwilr is missing many of the key features required to manage contracts at scale. 

💰 Pricing 

Qwilr’s most affordable plan is its business plan, which is priced from $35 per user per month. Qwilr also offers an enterprise plan which is charged at $590 per month, with an additional fee of $59 per month for each additional user.

💬 Independent reviews
“Qwilr has some great design options built-in, like using videos for the top banner, decent design element choices for text, background, etc”
“Some of the physical editing features are tough to interact with. The best way to work through this is to set up templates and have folks clone and edit them”
“Software is slightly clunky in places when trying to save and change parts of the proposal”
🏆 Best for:

Qwilr is one of the best PandaDoc alternatives for businesses seeking to craft more creative sales proposals. However, it’s also one of the most complex alternatives on the market, making it a less popular choice for businesses seeking a tool that’s easy to use and adopt. 

Which PandaDoc alternative is right for you?

When it comes to deciding which PandaDoc alternative is a good fit for your business, it’s important to consider the following factors:

  • Affordability: how do certain tools fit within your budget?
  • Users: who needs to use this software, and what do they need from it?
  • Document types: which types of documents are you looking to automate?
  • Implementation time: how quickly do you want to receive value from the tool?
  • Features: which features are most important for your use case?

For example, Juro is likely the best PandaDoc alternative for legal and sales teams managing contracts in fast-growth businesses. Juro is also one of the best alternatives to PandaDoc for businesses that want to receive value quickly from the tool. Meanwhile, tools like may be better suited for those seeking an all-in-one sales enablement solution instead. 

Still not sure what’s right for you?

If you’re still not sure which alternative to PandaDoc is best suited to your business, fill out the form below to discuss your needs with our friendly team. 

Frequently asked questions

Is PandaDoc free to use?

PandaDoc does offer a free eSignature plan. However, this free plan has extremely limited functionality compared to PandaDoc's paid plans.

Is PandaDoc HIPAA compliant?

Yes, PandaDoc is HIPAA compliant.

What is PandaDoc used for?

PandaDoc is used for creating and managing documents online, including but not limited to legal documents and sales proposals.

Does PandaDoc have an app?

Yes, PandaDoc does have an app that makes the tool available on mobile as well as desktop.

Want to save 90% of time on contracts?

Book a demo to find out how Juro is helping 6000+ companies to agree and manage contracts up to 10x faster than traditional tools.

Liked what you read? Stay in touch for all the latest insights.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
To learn more about the use of your personal data, please consult our readable Privacy Policy

Instantly book a personalized demo

  • Schedule a live, interactive demo with a Juro specialist

  • See in-depth analysis of your contract process - and tailored solutions

  • Find out what all-in-one contract automation can do for your business


Schedule a demo

To learn more about the use of your personal data, please consult our readable Privacy Policy.

Your privacy at a glance

Hello. We are Juro Online Limited (known by humans as Juro). Here's a summary of how we protect your data and respect your privacy.

Read the full policy
(no legalese, we promise)

Join our next 30-min live demo of Juro

Modern businesses use Juro to automate contracts from drafting to signature and beyond, in one intuitive platform that every team can use. Want to see how?

Sign me up