Agiloft is one of the oldest contract lifecycle management tools on the market. But does it deliver the functionality modern legal and business teams need today?
Agiloft is built for enterprise teams with the time, budget, and IT resources to configure a CLM from the ground up. Juro is built for teams that need contracts moving fast — with a browser-native editor, built-in eSignature, an intelligent repository, and AI across the full lifecycle, all without a lengthy implementation project.
Juro is top-rated for ease of setup and configuration, with teams regularly going from contract chaos to full deployment in a matter of weeks.
Agiloft's configurability is its biggest selling point — and its biggest barrier to entry. Getting it to work the way your business actually operates requires significant technical resources, admin effort, and often external consultants.
Juro is rated #1 for ease of use on G2 because any business user can initiate, track, and manage contracts without training or legal hand-holding. Legal sets the guardrails; the wider business moves at its own pace.
With Agiloft, that same depth that makes it powerful makes it hard for non-technical users to engage independently — reviewers consistently flag a bulky, difficult-to-navigate interface that limits self-serve in practice.
Agiloft does not include native eSignature functionality — you'll need to connect a third-party eSigning tool, manage an additional vendor relationship, and absorb the added cost and workflow fragmentation that comes with it.
Juro's legally binding eSignature feature is built directly into the platform, included across all plans, with customizable signing options and a complete audit trail.
.svg)
“Implementing Juro has revolutionized the way that my team manages contracts! Tasks that used to take 1-2 hours are now completed in a fraction of that time!”
“Using Juro as our CLM tool has changed the game for our legal team. Implementation was excellent. Each of our contract stakeholders (including counsel) has increased visibility into contract terms and status”
“One of the amazing things about Juro is that the sales team can self-serve and take a lot of the initial burden off of the legal team”
"There have been issues with regards to Agiloft's attitude towards Customer Service, including its approaches to managing implementation & licensing. While the platform is powerful this comes at a cost in terms of how easy the platform is to maintain"
“I don't believe Agiloft Contract Management Suite is user-friendly or intuitive. I find it difficult to manage once the contract is entered. It feels like it can only be used by someone who knows how to code. It seems difficult to use by entry-level teams”
“When there are bugs that you come across where needs to get addressed deeply, the customer service and support teams and admin team are too slow to acknowledge it”
Agiloft is highly configurable, which is one of its key strengths — but that configurability comes with implementation complexity.
Based on G2 reviewer feedback, implementations frequently take several months and often require IT involvement or external consultants to complete.
This is in contrast to Juro, where most teams are live within days to a few weeks, with implementation support included.
Agiloft is most commonly deployed in enterprise environments with the IT resource and implementation budget to support a complex rollout. Smaller legal teams or those without dedicated admin resource often find the configuration burden a significant barrier to getting value quickly.
Juro is purpose-built for lean legal teams who need to move fast, with an intuitive interface that non-technical business users can adopt without training.
No. Agiloft does not include native eSigning functionality. To collect signatures, contracts need to be routed to DocuSign or Adobe Sign — adding a separate vendor, additional cost, and a fragmented workflow.
Juro's legally binding eSignature is built into the platform and included across all plans, keeping the entire contract process in one place.
Both platforms offer AI-powered contract drafting, review, and data extraction. The key difference is how they're delivered. Agiloft's AI review and redlining — powered by its Screens product — operates primarily inside Microsoft Word, meaning it depends on your team using Word as part of the workflow.
Juro's AI works natively inside its browser-based editor, accessible to any user across the full contract lifecycle, with no add-ins or third-party tools required.
Agiloft is most commonly deployed in large enterprise environments with the IT resource and budget to support a complex rollout. The platform's complexity and total cost of ownership create real challenges for smaller and mid-market teams.
Juro is designed to scale with growing businesses — fast to implement, easy to adopt across teams, and built to handle increased contract volume without requiring additional admin overhead.
Agiloft's contract negotiation and AI-assisted redlining works via its Screens Word add-in — meaning the negotiation process happens inside Microsoft Word rather than within the platform itself.
Juro's negotiation functionality is fully browser-native: counterparties can review, comment, and redline directly in the platform, with no Word dependency and a complete audit trail throughout.
Juro integrates with Salesforce, HubSpot, Docusign, Slack, Microsoft Word, Google Drive, Zapier, Greenhouse, Ashby, ChatGPT, and a REST API. Zapier extends that reach further - it connects Juro contracts with 6,000+ apps without writing a single line of code.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
.svg){kind=logo}
.svg){kind=logo}
.svg){kind=logo}
Hello. We are Juro Online Limited (known by humans as Juro). Here's a summary of how we protect your data and respect your privacy.
