Juro vs Evisort

Does Evisort work for scaling businesses?

Evisort is a contract intelligence platform that empowers companies to streamline their contract management processes with the use of AI.

Evisort is most popular among enterprise businesses, with customers like Microsoft, Western Union and Workday. Evisort’s website also claims that the vendor has enterprise-grade AI, suggesting again that the tool is best suited to larger companies. 

However, this means that Evisort may not be the right fit for scaling and mid-market businesses with different needs and budgets. After all, the processes, resources and demands can vary a lot between scaling companies and enterprise clients.

In this comparison page, we’ll explore which features Evisort offers, how effective they are, and how the platform compares to AI contract management solution, Juro. Find out more about Evisort's features, limitations and pricing below.

Evisort limitations

While Evisort is described as an all-in-one contract tool, its post-signature features are more advanced than those used to create and sign contracts. Let's explore this limitation of Evisort, and some others, in more detail now.

1. No native eSigning solution

‍Like many CLM solutions, Evisort doesn't offer native eSignature functionality. Instead, users will need to pay for a separate eSigning solution like DocuSign and integrate the two platforms. This is distinct from all-in-one contract management platforms like Juro that have a native electronic signature feature.

This may not be a problem for larger companies that already have company-wide DocuSign subscriptions. However, it can be a point of friction and extra cost for those that don't.

2. Limited integrations

While Evisort offers a handful of integrations, it doesn't offer native integrations with popular platforms like HubSpot, Slack, Greenhouse and Workday. This limits sales and HR teams using those platforms as they can't automate their contracts directly from their CRM or HRIS, unlike Juro users.

Evisort does, however, integrate with several different Microsoft platforms, making it a good fit for businesses that want to continue working from traditional tools like Word.

3. Steep learning curve

‍According to independent reviews left by Evisort users, the platform can be difficult to use, with some customers describing it as 'finicky at times', or saying that it took them some time to get up to speed with the platform.

While this is fairly standard for a lot of enterprise-level CLMs, it isn't true for more modern contracting solutions like Juro, which is above the industry average for ease of use on G2.

That said, many large businesses will have the time and resource to invest in the appropriate training and workflow setups. It's smaller businesses with lean legal teams that may not.

How does Juro compare?

Like Evisort, Juro offers contract AI functionality. For example, Juro users can use Juro's AI assistant to draft, review and summarize contracts. This makes Juro a great alternative to AI contract review software and AI contract analysis tools.

However, Juro also offers end-to-end contract management functionality, empowering teams to create, agree and execute contracts faster and more efficiently. Let's explore Juro's rich feature set in more detail now.

1. Rich-text contract editor

Juro's rich text editor streamlines the process of contract creatio and editing, allowing users to to incorporate rich media elements such as images, tables, and GIFs into contracts for a more human touch.  

Juro users can generate contracts in seconds using automated templates, conditional logic, and natural language Q&A, all of which empower them to generate contracts within seconds, regardless of their legal expertise.

2. AI-enabled contract drafting

Juro's AI Assistant empowers users to automate the contract drafting process. By instructing the AI, users can quickly generate entire contracts or individual clauses based on the information provided in their contract playbook and internal guidelines, ensuring a highly efficient contract creation process.

Want tips on how to prompt AI assistants more effectively? Check out this guide to ChatGPT for lawyers.

3. Real-time contract collaboration

Teams using Juro don't need to jump back and forth between different files during the review and negotiation phase. Juro's contract negotiation capabilities empower legal and business teams to add comments to and collaborate on contracts within one unified workspace.

Juro users can add comments that are visible externally or keep discussions internal, ensuring the privacy at every stage.

4. Instant visibility into contract data

Juro users can gain visibility into contracts and their data in a matter of seconds, with a data-rich contract repository, real-time contract dashboard, and robust search capabilities.

Since Juro builds contracts as structured data, both business and legal teams can quickly access and query important contract metadata, such as renewal dates, transaction costs, and contract statuses.

Juro's Legal AI Assistant enables users to automate contract review and analysis. This can be leveraged to identify risks, provide summaries of key clauses, and identify deviations from accepted standard terms.

Interested in an AI-enabled contract management tool that can reduce contract admin and empower your teams to close deals faster? Book your personalized demo of Juro today.

Evisort pricing

Evisort does not advertise their pricing or plans, making it unclear which features are available under which plans, and how much these cost.

However, Evisort is an enterprise-level tool, so the pricing will likely reflect that, making it out-of-budget for many scaling and mid-market businesses. Evisort users will also have to fork out for a separate eSigning solution, adding to the cost of the contract management platform.

Meanwhile, Juro offers flexible plans to suit in-house legal teams in companies of all sizes, with unlimited users and templates on all plans. Check out our pricing page to select a plan that’s right for your business, or get in touch.

Evisort reviews

Read independent Evisort reviews

Evisort is rated 4.7 out of 5 on G2 and 4.8 out of 5 on Capterra, matching Juro's ratings on both independent review sites. In these reviews, Evisort users frequently compliment the tool's AI capabilities and post-signature functionality. However, they often complain about the tool's usability, too.

Below are some independent reviews left by Evisort users on review sites like Capterra and G2:

“Evisort can seem a bit complicated if you aren't familiar with the platform, especially when building workflows”

“The workflow generator can be a bit finicky at times, but honestly, once you get the first two under your belt, it flows much easier”

"Evisort's automated review process flags issues quickly and efficiently. It can provide users with fallback provisions for heavily negotiated terms"

Juro reviews

As we just mentioned, Juro is also rated 4.7 and 4.8 on G2 and Capterra respectively, with reviews from more than 100 satisfied customers and 'Leader' status in CLM.

Unlike Evisort, Juro's reviews often compliment the platform's intuitive interface and ease of use, as well as the platform's contract automation capabilities that save businesses up to 90 per cent of the time they previously spent on contracts.

Below are some independent reviews left by Juro users on review sites like G2 and Capterra:

"Since implementing, we've reduced our sales cycle, created a user-friendly way to sign contracts, and managed our data in a more robust way"

"The Juro platform has saved my team 90% of the time we used to spend writing and sharing contracts. The platform is efficient and intuitive"

‍

Want to find out more about how Juro enables teams to agree contracts up to ten times faster than traditional tools? Check out our case studies or hit the button below to book your personalized demo.